User login
Recent blog posts
- Three Dawkins Quotes
- A(nother) rational response to rationailty
- How to survive in today's recession...
- Einstein's Buddhism?
- Isaac Newton, a Creationist?
- Judge Jones III, may I approach the bench?
- Michael Behe's response to science journal (peer review continued...)
- Enough with the "Peer Review" argument already
- Michael Behe, ID, and "intellectual dishonesty"
- Grace, Blood and the idea of a proxy sacrifice
Whew! That's tiring. You
Whew! That's tiring. You should Google the "Gish Gallop" sometime. You've become quite adept at it.
You misinterpret my intentions. I did not post as a shotgun blast with the expectation of your response. You've commented your beliefs on each of those here already. I posted on the varying lines of evidences to make the point that evolution is not the "no-brainer" we are led to believe.
Now, you have responded with answers to each of the above. Great. I wasn't asking for them. I was pointing out that evolution is built on inference and lack of data, much of the data and observation even evolutionists admit we could never get!
All this for a theory that is purported as scientific fact, as proven as the round earth, the orbit of the moon.
Give me a break...